DFINITY Foundation

ICDevs.org

CryptoIsGood

Anvil

ICPL.app

ysyms

The Accumulators’ Neuron

RawTech Venture

Paul Young

ICPMANUAL

8YearGangDAO

Isaac Valadez

Krzysztof

Nicolas.ic

Smaug’s Neuron for Retail Investors

ICLight.io

Taggr Network

Sonic AMM

Rakeoff.io

OpenChat

ELNA AI

GEEKFACTORY

ICP Hub México

ICP Hub Poland

Jerry Banfield

WaterNeuron

ICP Hub Bulgaria

Gold DAO

NeuronPool

LORIMER ♾️ 🐶

B3Pay

ZenithCode

Aviate Labs

D-QUORUM

Yuku AI

CO.DELTA △

DragginCorp

Gwojda

Thyassa

🌮 TACO DAO Neuron

Ωmega-reject

Ωmega-vote

αlpha-vote

Cybersecurity

cyberowl

Dexter Caff/acc

JMVR

Smacker

HashEra

Transitioning or Archiving the DFINITY Forum to Improve Community Health and Focus on Protocol Development

Propose a text that can be adopted or rejected. No code is executed when a motion is adopted. An adopted motion should guide the future strategy of the Internet Computer ecosystem.

### Proposal Summary

The Internet Computer Developer Forum ([forum.dfinity.org](http://forum.dfinity.org)) has become a significant source of negative energy, repetitive complaints, toxicity, and off-topic venting that harms community morale, deters new developers, and distracts from constructive technical discussion and ecosystem growth.

This motion proposes that DFINITY and the NNS community take decisive action to **freeze active posting on the current forum**, archive valuable content, and migrate to healthier, more productive communication channels. The goal is to preserve utility while eliminating the "bad vibes" that are beyond simple moderation fixes.

### Background and Rationale

- **Observed Issues**: The forum, while hosting useful technical threads (developers, Motoko, SNS, releases, etc.), frequently features personal attacks, conspiracy theories, and low-signal complaints. This creates a hostile first impression for newcomers and burns out contributors.
- **Impact on ICP**: A toxic public forum undermines adoption, developer onboarding, and the project's reputation. Healthy communities drive long-term success; perpetual negativity risks accelerating decline.
- **Precedent**: Many projects have successfully migrated from legacy forums to Discord, Telegram, GitHub Discussions, or custom on-chain solutions for better moderation and focus. The IC's decentralized ethos supports experimenting with superior tools.

Freezing or sunsetting the forum is not censorship—it's responsible stewardship. Valuable historical content can be preserved via archives, search indexes, or static mirrors.

### Proposed Actions (Motion Text)

If adopted, this motion recommends the following to DFINITY, node providers, and the broader community:

1. **Immediate Freeze**: Disable new posts and replies on [forum.dfinity.org](http://forum.dfinity.org) while keeping it readable as an archive. Announce a clear timeline (e.g., 30-60 days).
2. **Content Archiving**:
   - Export or mirror key categories (Developers, Showcase, etc.) to a static, searchable site or GitHub repo.
   - Prioritize technical documentation and successful project threads for easy migration to new platforms.
3. **Migration to Better Alternatives**:
   - **Primary**: Expand official Discord/Telegram channels with strong moderation, topic-specific rooms, and AMAs.
   - **Technical Focus**: Use GitHub Discussions or a dedicated IC Discourse instance for dev support.
   - **On-Chain Innovation**: Explore or fund (via NNS/SNS) a decentralized community platform running on ICP canisters (e.g., using OpenChat, custom dApp with reputation systems, or integrated with NNS proposals).
   - **Governance**: Create clear community guidelines enforced consistently. Reward positive contributions (e.g., via bounties or recognition).
4. **DFINITY & NNS Support**: DFINITY should lead the transition transparently. The NNS could vote on funding for migration tools, moderation teams, or new platform development if needed.
5. **Success Metrics**: Reduced toxicity complaints, increased developer activity in new channels, higher-quality discussions, and improved sentiment in ecosystem updates.

### Why This Helps the Protocol Survive and Thrive

The forum is not the protocol, but it is a major public face. Cleaning it up removes a drag on progress. The IC's strength lies in its technology (canisters, NNS, scalability)—not in tolerating endless negativity. A focused, constructive community will attract builders, users, and investors far better than the current state.

This is a **non-binding motion** (as typical for such recommendations), but strong adoption would signal community consensus and pressure for action.

### Call to Action

- **Vote Yes** if you believe the current forum dynamics are harming ICP more than helping.
- **Vote No** or abstain if you think incremental moderation suffices (though evidence suggests otherwise).

Let's end the shit and build forward. The protocol's future depends on execution and healthy collaboration—not forum drama.